Hello! My name is Heidi Good Swiacki. I have been married to Steve for 25 years, which has been filled with laughter, trust and love. We have 2 great kids, Ashton 22 and Chris 16. I have ALS, aka Lou Gehrigs Disease. I was officially diagnosed March '05, I was just turning 45. This blog will be about a myriad of topics. I will share my ALS story which will hopefully encourage others. It will show that quality of life comes in many forms. I have to tell you up front that there will be some spiritual references. Don't be afraid or turned off by that. Since I have had ALS I have seen many miracles. Let's be realistic, who can be a happy, non-verbal,ventilated quadriplegic without Faith? I hope you will join me and make this an interesting, educational, inspirational forum. Humor and the ability to enjoy life is required! :)

Heidi passed away 3-25-13 :(

August 4, 2013

Hello, Steve here. To help with the healing process, I am going to continue on with Heidi's blog, primarily talking about our lives and how we as a family are learning to live on with Heidi's memories pushing us forward. Topics covered will be geared towards the affects ALS has on loved ones.

Wednesday, February 24, 2016

Update to Heidi's Trial 2-24-16

Mistrial Declared for Elderly Mother in Solvang ALS Murder Case

Jury hopedeadlocked on fate of Marjorie Good, 90, who is accused of killing her daughter, Solvang woman Heidi Good

A mistrial was declared Tuesday in the murder case against Marjorie Good, left, by Superior Court Superior Court Rogelio Flores.
A mistrial was declared Tuesday in the murder case against Marjorie Good, left, by Superior Court Superior Court Rogelio Flores. (Janene Scully / Noozhawk photo)
By Janene Scully, Noozhawk North County Editor | @JaneneScully | updated logo 8:25 p.m. |

A mistrial was declared Tuesday afternoon in the trial of an elderly mother accused of conspiring to kill her daughter, a Solvang woman who had ALS. 
Saying he believed jurors were hopelessly deadlocked, Santa Barbara County Superior Court Judge Rogelio Flores declared the mistrial in the case of Marjorie Good, 90.
The judge later revealed concerns about possible juror misconduct.
A criminal grand jury handed down indictments against Good and caregiver Wanda Nelson, 63, after hearing evidence over several days last year in the death of Heidi Good on March 25, 2013, saying they conspired to kill the woman.

But defense attorneys countered that a flawed investigation led to charges against the women, and asserted that a ventilator malfunction led to Heidi's death.
Flores ordered Good to return to court March 21 for another hearing, which will be before Judge James Voysey.
“Currently, Ms. Good waived time on the trial through September, so sometime between now and September, we will have to make a decision on whether we’re going to retry her or not,” said Senior Deputy District Attorney Ann Bramsen, who was filling in Tuesday for trial prosecutor Cynthia Gresser.
In addition to deciding whether to retry Good, prosecutors could reach a plea agreement with the defendant to avoid another lengthy trial. 
“To have to go back and retry this case as a murder case, I think, would be a huge miscarriage of justice,” said attorney David Bixby, who represented Good. "She's not a murderer."
 “If she is, she has virtually fooled everybody in her life," Bixby added.
A number of witnesses testified that his client was a good mom who loved Heidi and supported her desire to remain alive, Bixby said.
“How anybody could conclude that she’s a murderer is beyond me,” Bixby added. 
The jury for the trial that spanned more than three months tried to do the best job it could do, one juror said. 
“It was very emotional for a lot of the jurors,” one woman said. “It was hard, it was difficult, very very difficult.”
Last week, a separate jury convicted Nelson of involuntary manslaughter after finding her not guilty of first- and second-degree murder.
On Tuesday, the Good jury of 10 women and two men had returned to the judge several times with questions, and earlier in the day he had directed the panel to continue its deliberations.
Early in the afternoon, Flores and attorneys met with the jurors in private, after which the mistrial was declared.
Later, Flores revealed jurors had seen media coverage of the Nelson jury verdict and discussed the topic in the deliberation room.
Outside the jury’s presence, the judge revealed that the jury had found Good not guilty of first- and second-degree murder but was deadlocked 11 to 1 toward guilty of involuntary manslaughter. 
However, the judge did not record those verdicts.
“The issue before the court was that there was a discussion in the jury deliberation room regarding Ms. Nelson’s verdict amongst the (Good) jurors,” Flores said.
“There was some question about whether or not that news media coverage had an impact on the outcome of the deliberations,” Flores added.  
Throughout the trial, the judge admonished jurors to refrain from news reports or other information about the case.
Jurors told the judge about accidentally over hearing reports about the verdicts in the Nelson trial via news coverage and a conversation in a restaurant.
In private interviews with the judge and attorneys, the jurors gave differing opinions about the extent of the discussions about the Nelson trial verdict and its influence on Good trial jurors.
However, the judge ruled against reading the verdicts in the jury’s presence, saying it appeared votes were taken Thursday before the discussions about the other jury’s verdict, Flores said.
The Good jury’s verdict forms weren’t signed and dated until Monday — after the discussions about the verdict in Nelson’s trial.
“Had those  jury forms been signed on Thursday afternoon, I would have recorded the verdicts today because any discussion of the news media coverage did not appear to occur until Friday morning … according to the discussions we had individually with the jurors,” Flores said.
Bixby objected to Flores determining jury misconduct occurred and declaring a mistrial.
"I don't believe there was any misconduct that rose of the level where he should have discharged the jury, because they had by this time decided against murder," Bixby said outside the courtroom.
The trial was unique because of the separate panels considering fates of the individual defendants.
In another unusual incident Tuesday morning, court officials instructed Nelson, who has been released from jail pending sentencing, to leave the courtroom. 
Nelson’s attorney, Lori Pedego, objected to the suggestion made by prosecutors to remove Nelson from the courtroom.
Flores said the request to ask Nelson to sit in the hallway was made out of an abundance of caution.
“This is not personal,” Flores said. “This is just being very pragmatic here trying to keep the scales of justice balanced.” 

Friday, February 19, 2016

Trial update 2/18/16

Jury Rejects Murder Charges, Convicts ALS Caregiver of Involuntary Manslaughter

Wanda Nelson, 63, was accused of conspiring to kill Heidi Good of Solvang; second jury weighing elderly mother's fate

Heidi, only you really know what happened 3/25/13. Wanda is now a convicted felon, her conviction still does not answer what actually happened to you that day.

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

Trial update 2-10-16

Heidi, here I go again, no last post just yet. Your trial is coming to an end, but at what cost?

There will be no winners in the end, just loss and the feeling of complete helplessness.

Christopher was on the stand for 5 hours .  Heidi you would have been proud of him, Chris maintained his composure and respect of the individuals who really did not treat him with the same respect.

Ashton was on the stand for 1.5 days, she is stronger than Chris and I combined and so much like you.

I testified for 2.5 days, this was as hard as the day we lost you.

Our relationship was built upon love and trust, we argued and had disagreements just like any couple would. We used e-mail to communicate our frustrations and thoughts from that moment in time. You were unable to talk, so we had no other way to really communicate our feelings. We were both very open and wrote what was on our minds. The defense tried to portray/paint our relationship as one that was not real.

Just like any successful relationship, we said what we said and we made up. This making our relationship stronger.  There should have been no misrepresentation  made of our relationship. There is no way anyone could comprehend our lives in dealing with this horrible disease. Given what we endured, I still feel we were stronger than most couples

Our justice system is flawed in its treatment of "witness's" who are called upon to testify. All human etiquette is thrown out the window, as the lawyers are able to badger, make accusations and have all means afforded to them to try and paint you as a person you are not. They are able to grandstand and yell  at you on the stand, ask the same question over and over, all in an effort to frustrate and or upset you to solicit a negative response out of anger. They ask leading yes or no questions, all in an effort to make you out as a person you are not.

Sweetie, there will be no winners at the end of your trial, if they are convicted it does not bring you back, you are still in heaven, if they are acquitted of any charges you are still in heaven but we are left with the burden of what really happened that day.

This sum's up our relationship

Saturday, February 6, 2016

World wide viewing

Below represents world wide interest in your blog.

Pageviews by Countries
Graph of most popular countries among blog viewers
United States
United Kingdom